8/12/2023 0 Comments Sophos utm vs pfsense![]() "Other content filtering solutions that I have used had more bells and whistles, but given the cost, complexity, and management overhead, I am very pleased with Meraki’s solution.".This promotion continues till the next fiscal year of Cisco." Meraki had a good promotion for remote workers or remote workforce. It costs $1,200 for three years for one endpoint. We have a license for three years, and it is renewed every three years. "We just have to pay for the product and the license.We want to control internet usage based on sites and their content, and pfSense doesn't perform this function." "The stability could be improved." "The integration should be improved." "The solution could improve by having centralized management and API support online." Also, it should be easier to get reports on how many users are connecting simultaneously and how sections connect in real-time." "The usage reports can be better." "Ease of use is a problem for a user who is unfamiliar with this product because, in the interface, everything has to be set manually." "pfSense has some limitations in detecting site sessions. I don't know if they could zero in on some markets and potentially for small, medium businesses specifically, give them a stripped-down version of the GUI for pfSense." "The integration of pfSense with EPS and EDS could be better. The GUI interface that I had gotten into was rather elaborate. "In terms of areas of improvement, the interface seemed like it had a lot. If that information became available to us, then it would improve our ease of management, and we would be able to make certain adjustments instead of having to go to them." "Meraki MX firewalls are great for small to medium-sized businesses, but other solutions are better for enterprise-sized companies." It has been around one month since we have been having this problem, and we don't have enough support from Meraki to solve the problem." "It is very expensive." "They're very complacent and I find the rule set to be a little arcane." "Meraki has some hidden features and information that is only privy to their engineers. We have to manually turn off the modems and other pieces of equipment and manually establish the VPN. When the energy goes down and is back again, the VPN link doesn't get established. This will frustrate more advanced users at times." "We have been having a problem with the VPN. I understand the approach is to keep the dashboard easier to understand. The specific model you require could be out of stock, or Meraki isn't making that model anymore, so Meraki should improve that." "Meraki tech support staff have a lot more visibility into your network than you do, which is frustrating at times. We had a couple of RMAs, so that could be an area for improvement, but in terms of how the RMAs went, the turnaround time and getting those back into redeployment were quick.Īnother area for improvement in Meraki MX is that when you're scaling for multiple locations, you need to use the same model, but the model you'd need is only available for a short time. "An area for improvement in Meraki MX is that it needs some provision, as supplying the unit through Cisco can be tedious at times, but as far as the product itself and its offerings, Meraki MX is five-star all the way." "We had minor issues with Meraki MX. Whatever we use is valuable." "pfSense is easy to use, has user-friendly dashboards, and useful blocking features." So, you can download plugins to protect your network." "pfSense allows us to spread the hours of connection and do the filtering on the pfSense site." "I mostly like all of it. There are more than one million printers that are in danger, and everybody knows that hackers are using them to enter the network. Did you forget a printer port? Most attacks at the moment are happening through printers, and they can tell you immediately that you forgot to close the port of the printer. You can also remote and monitor your network and see where the gap is. Sometimes, they are free of charge, and sometimes, you have to pay for them, but you can purchase or download very valuable plugins or add-ons to perform internal testing of your network and simulate a denial-of-service attack or whichever attack you want to simulate. We like the OpenVPN clients that can be deployed using pfSense very much." "The plugins or add-ons are most valuable. "The initial setup is not complex." "The initial setup was simple and fast." "Is good at blocking IP addresses." "My technicians find the pfSense's web interface very useful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |